@jeffw@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 8 months agoItalian investigators trying to establish why Bayesian superyacht sank so quicklywww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up1132arrow-down19
arrow-up1123arrow-down1external-linkItalian investigators trying to establish why Bayesian superyacht sank so quicklywww.theguardian.com@jeffw@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 8 months agomessage-square59fedilink
minus-square@Crackhappy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish21•8 months agoI think we need more empirical data, in the form of more rich people sinking on super yachts to determine whether this is a typical case or not.
minus-square@Death_Equity@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish5•8 months agoA single case could be the outlier. We definitely need more superyacht sinkings to have a trustworthy dataset to draw conclusions from.
minus-square@Death_Equity@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•8 months agoScience sometimes requires sacrifice for the greater good, we must be prepared to make a great sacrifice.
minus-square@Phegan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•8 months agoWhile we are at it, let’s send more billionaires to the Titanic
minus-square@rimmedalpha@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-28 months agohttps://tenor.com/vVz9.gif
I think we need more empirical data, in the form of more rich people sinking on super yachts to determine whether this is a typical case or not.
A single case could be the outlier. We definitely need more superyacht sinkings to have a trustworthy dataset to draw conclusions from.
We simply cannot risk not knowing.
Science sometimes requires sacrifice for the greater good, we must be prepared to make a great sacrifice.
While we are at it, let’s send more billionaires to the Titanic
does the titanic sub count?
https://tenor.com/vVz9.gif