• @Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    224 hours ago

    “NOOOO the foreign man who’s been fucking me is gone, I MUST find a new foreign man to fuck me or I will die!” -Idiot humans

    • @Luffy879@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      20
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      foreign man

      Why „foreign man”? Why not „Capitalist”? Or „Megacorporation”?

      Foreign people are not the only ones who are fucking you over.

      • @ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Why „foreign man”? Why not „Capitalist”? Or „Megacorporation”?

        In this specific case, the man fucking them over is banned because it’s foreign. The position of domestic man fucking them over is not vacant so they only need to find a replacement for the position of foreign man fucking them over.

          • @Reygle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -520 hours ago

            The China kind.

            “We may disclose any of the Information We Collect to respond to subpoenas, court orders, legal process, law enforcement requests, legal claims, or government inquiries, and to protect and defend the rights, interests, safety, and security of the Platform, our affiliates, users, or the public. We may also share any of the Information We Collect to enforce any terms applicable to the Platform, to exercise or defend any legal claims, and comply with any applicable law.”

            • @Packet@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              720 hours ago

              Wow, a very normal, and widespread TOS part. Which almost EVERY SINGLE COMPANY has. And whatever yammer yer were doing with “communist mega corporation” is also very strange. I hope for the better of yer.

              • @Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                121 minutes ago

                No.

                Many companies in the western world will not freely give your information to law enforcement and will even actively fight it. We saw that with apple, we saw that with signal and specifically in germany, we had some other smaller profile cases that have fought law enforcement.

                In China, companies are forced to give the government free access to all of its information without any subpoena or anything needed. Which is why many western companies can’t do business in china themselves without having a Chinese partner company that handles it for them (Blizzard needed NetEase, for example)