I dont think this is to go after minorities. It will have that effect, at least for minorities who received a promotion or position change within the last 4 months, but that isn’t the goal here.
This is to lay the groundwork to fire a very specific person. Somebody the president likely doesn’t have the ability to unilaterally fire himself, but somebody he can throw under the bus and perhaps have a show trial thrown their way, which would begin the process to remove that person.
Question: who has the ability to block necessary parts of the administration’s coming goals, can’t directly be fired by the president, and has oversight over the employment contracts of federal employees?
The way this is worded…
I dont think this is to go after minorities. It will have that effect, at least for minorities who received a promotion or position change within the last 4 months, but that isn’t the goal here.
This is to lay the groundwork to fire a very specific person. Somebody the president likely doesn’t have the ability to unilaterally fire himself, but somebody he can throw under the bus and perhaps have a show trial thrown their way, which would begin the process to remove that person.
Question: who has the ability to block necessary parts of the administration’s coming goals, can’t directly be fired by the president, and has oversight over the employment contracts of federal employees?
deleted by creator
I think we just figured it out with the help of chat GPT.
It’s either the national labor relations board or the consumer protections.
Why not both?
Oh they definitely want both of them, I just think they worded this to specifically go after one.