@MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world • 10 months agoSince Xorg is getting old, looking at trying Wayland WMslemmy.worldimagemessage-square238fedilinkarrow-up1567arrow-down123
arrow-up1544arrow-down1imageSince Xorg is getting old, looking at trying Wayland WMslemmy.world@MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world • 10 months agomessage-square238fedilink
minus-squareAItoothbrushlinkfedilinkEnglish-10•10 months agoLook at their comments. Its always do you have a source, can you explain, etc, never adding to the discussion. Classical centrist arguments and im gonna die on this hill.
minus-square@el_bhm@lemm.eelinkfedilink6•10 months agoHow is knowing a context a centrist argument? People want to understand.
minus-square@FauxLiving@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•10 months agoHaving to support your argument with facts and reasoning is a well known leftist plot to undermine my feeling-based reality.
minus-square@threshold_dweller@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoHuh. Look at that, another toxic user to block.
minus-squareKalciferlinkfedilink1•5 months ago […] Classical centrist arguments […] How are you defining centrism?
minus-squareKalciferlinkfedilink1•5 months ago […] Its always do you have a source, can you explain, etc, never adding to the discussion. […] Do you not think adding sources and context is adding to the discussion?
tsk tsk, extremist.
Look at their comments. Its always do you have a source, can you explain, etc, never adding to the discussion. Classical centrist arguments and im gonna die on this hill.
How is knowing a context a centrist argument? People want to understand.
Having to support your argument with facts and reasoning is a well known leftist plot to undermine my feeling-based reality.
Huh. Look at that, another toxic user to block.
How are you defining centrism?
Do you not think adding sources and context is adding to the discussion?