Courtesy to Twitter user XdanielArt (date of publication: 8 June 2024)

  • @anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6518 hours ago

    With GIMP 3.0 it’s a bit better at least, they’ve finally added non-destructive editing:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfaq-Cm1ZkA

    Full changelog here:
    https://www.gimp.org/release-notes/gimp-3.0.html

    I’d dare say that unless you’ve already learnt Photoshop (and have to unlearn it) then Darktable+GIMP works fine for home photo editing.
    If you’re used to Photoshop and your skills with it is what puts bread on the table… then I completely understand not switching tools.

    • @LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Yeah but it should tell you something that they just figured out non-destructive editing by 2025. Love the team, want to see it succeed, but it’s not PS at all.

      • Rose
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        GIMP didn’t “just figure out non-destructive editing by 2025”. You’re talking as if it was something that the GIMP development team just decided to randomly add recently, after previously ignoring user demands.

        The foundation for that functionality (GEGL) has been in development for ages and was also used for some functionality in 2.6 for a long time. The reason why it took this long is that it’s a pretty fundamental change to how the app works. Also, that meshed with other upcoming changes at the time. Also, small development team.

        • @LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          I have said several times I have gimp and support them. I didn’t think they just discovered it - I’m saying the fact that in 2025 they just implemented it is indicative of why I say they’re behind.

          They do good work. Yes they’re a small team. It doesn’t change the fact that the software has limitations.

          The question isn’t “are they working hard?” or “are they doing a lot for what they are/their size?” It’s “how does it stack against PS?” And of course they can’t hang with the billion dollar international company with an army of programmers.

      • @anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2017 hours ago

        My understanding is that a lot of tech debt has been removed with the release of 3.0 and I’m hopeful it will make future updates simpler and faster. :)

    • @doxxx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1217 hours ago

      As somebody who has been trying to decided which of the RAW photo editors to use, I can tell you that Darktable has a steep learning curve over Lightroom. The UI is incredibly dense and the names of sliders don’t make sense unless you’re an image science expert.

      • @anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        I’ll take your word for it, I’ve never used Lightroom.

        Whenever I played around with Darktable it seems finding a tutorial to get the effect I wanted was just a minute of searching away, and there’s a ton of beginner tutorials available too.
        https://www.darktable.org/2024/12/howto-in-5.0/

        But then I was the kid that rtfm the game manual on my way home from the store and love dense UIs as an adult. :)

      • jwiggler
        link
        fedilink
        English
        416 hours ago

        Darktable is a godsend to me for converting film negatives.But I pretty much only use image conversion, RGB curve, then fidget with the exposure and RGB sliders in negadoctor a little more then I’m done. No idea how to do anything else.