Besides size and looks, nowadays is there any significant differences between distros that might make one “better” than the other?
Besides size and looks, nowadays is there any significant differences between distros that might make one “better” than the other?
I’d argue the reverse is true as well:
Distro choice is important for people who enjoy messing with their system and want to meticulously set up every piece.
I think if people want to set up every piece they’re better off downloading Arch and just installing packages they want
That’s distro choice, no? Debian minimal would also be good for the same purpose, or any other minimal distro, really.